This page is intended for direct product sharing, search indexing, and demo-case discovery.

ZPPINN4D Product Introduction

Physics-AI workflow software for geometry setup, PINN training, prediction, and result review.

ZPPINN4D is a multi-physics PINN software stack for engineering simulation and Physics AI workflows. The product connects geometry preparation, material and region setup, boundary and initial condition definition, sampling, training, prediction, and result review in one working line.

The current product fit is controlled-scope engineering validation, pre-sales demonstration, and joint development on verified physics lines where condition changes, reference data, and repeated comparison runs matter.

Watch Demo Request a Demo Direct contact: fasbridge@foxmail.com
Physics LinesThermal, structure, CFD, electromagnetics
WorkflowGeometry, conditions, sampling, training, prediction
InterfacesDesktop workbench, Python API, CLI
OutputsYAML, VTK, CSV, model artifacts

Functions

What ZPPINN4D is built to handle.

ZPPINN4D is strongest when the same geometry needs repeated condition changes, controlled training, prediction reruns, and reference-driven comparison inside a defined workflow.

01

Workbench preprocessing and project setup

Prepare the engineering object in a desktop workbench before solver execution starts.

  • Geometry import or basic geometry creation
  • Region, material, boundary, and initial-condition setup
  • Sampling preview, project save, reopen, and export
02

PINN training and prediction workflow

Run solver-ready YAML workflows that cover training, prediction, model reload, and result export on controlled physics lines.

  • Standard PINN training and prediction
  • Multi-stage training and model save/load
  • CPU and GPU execution paths
03

Reference-data and parametric study support

Use verified reference data and repeated condition updates to build faster comparison loops on the same case family.

  • Physics-constrained and data-enhanced training
  • Condition updates across verified workflows
  • Deviation metrics and result comparison artifacts
04

Automation and delivery surfaces

Move stable workflows from the desktop UI into Python or CLI execution when a team needs scripted preprocessing, batch runs, or regression-style reuse.

Interface

Where the workflow is prepared and checked.

These screens come from the product quickstart flow and show geometry setup, boundary selection, pre-run validation, and result inspection.

Geometry workspace
Primary View

Geometry workspace

The workbench starts from a geometry view where model construction and simulation-oriented setup remain connected.

Workflow

Typical use path inside ZPPINN4D.

01Prepare geometry and physics

Import or create geometry, define regions, assign materials, and set the target physics line.

02Set conditions and sampling

Configure boundary conditions, initial conditions, and sampling settings for the target workflow.

03Export and run the solver

Generate solver-ready configuration, then launch training or prediction through the desktop product or automation entry points.

04Review outputs and rerun

Inspect VTK, CSV, and log outputs, then update conditions or network settings for the next comparison cycle.

Examples

Professional demo materials already organized around product use.

The current professional demo tree already contains product-entry material, physics-domain cases, desktop demo routes, bridge documents, input geometry, and result samples.

Thermal flagship

Shaft steady thermal case with Abaqus reference data

The thermal route changes the left-end fixed temperature from 100 to 60 while keeping the right-end side at 200, then predicts the new temperature field directly from the trained PINN workflow.

Reference
Abaqus
Compare points
1012
Total sample points
119128
RMSE
6.7313
Relative L2
0.0442989
Correlation
0.998811
Structure line

Ribbed-structure modal case on imported geometry

The strongest structural showcase is the modal line on imported solid geometry, where the same object is reused across multiple Young's modulus settings and compared at the current 2.15e11 case.

Reference
Abaqus
Compare points
914
Training setups
1.9e11 / 2.05e11 / 2.2e11
Current setup
2.15e11
RMSE
0.00131064
Correlation
1
CFD line

3D square-cylinder wake flow with Fluent rerun timing

This route uses the same point cloud and the same three time slices to compare a new outlet-pressure case after the PINN model has been trained on earlier Fluent runs.

Reference
Fluent
Pressure setups
0 / 25 / 50 / 75 -> 100
Compare points
2940 x 3 = 8820
Velocity RMSE
0.0442462
Fluent rerun
136.233879 s
PINN predict
1.059377 s
EM line

HFSS connector prediction and parameter-response route

The current EM showcase works on a connector object with air, dielectric, and copper conductors. It already covers same-point training, same-point prediction, and a separate timing route for changed material conductivity.

Reference
HFSS
Frequency
2.5e9 Hz
Compare points
128
Amplitude case RMSE
759.173
Amplitude case Relative L2
0.365804
Conductivity timing
18.346324 s vs 1.841931 s